Showing posts with label Illinois governor’s race. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Illinois governor’s race. Show all posts

Monday, August 18, 2014

PAT QUINN TO BLACK VOTERS: BRUCE RAUNER = RAHM EMANUEL?

8/18/14

Bruce Rauner, according to the polls, holds a big lead in the 2014 Illinois governor’s race.   My asking around, and my instincts, tells me that the polls are right.  Even natural Pat Quinn voters (liberal women, union members, even friends of mine who know Mr. Quinn and voted for him out of a sense of Fenwick affinity in 2011) have told me they won’t, even can’t, vote for the Governor this time around.   One would be a fool to write off Pat Quinn’s chances in any election; he is a great campaigner and a very clever politician.  (See, inter alia, 2014 Illinois Gubernatorial Election Year Rag:   “Hand Me Down My Bulletproof Vest…” (Rant Lifestyle, 1/20/14) and PAUL VALLAS ON THE TICKET:  PAT QUINN MAKES ANOTHER BRILLIANT MOVETOWARD RE-ELECTION, 11/8/13.)   Plenty of former politicians got that way underestimating Pat Quinn.

But Pat Quinn is clearly in trouble.  If he is to win, he has to do a lot of things, and one of those is to shore up his loyal base among black voters, primarily in Chicago.  How can he do that?

Black voters, if one believes the polls, don’t like Mayor Rahm Emanuel.   Rahm Emanuel has endorsed Pat Quinn but he is a close friend of Bruce Rauner.  Mr. Rauner helped Mr. Emanuel become wealthy during the Mayor’s brief stint as an “investment banker,” the two have done business together, and they even vacation together.   So at least one strategy would appear to hold some potential for Pat Quinn:  convince black voters that a vote for Mr. Rauner is a vote for Mr. Emanuel.

This will be difficult, especially when Mr. Emanuel is publicly, if not all that enthusiastically, endorsing Pat Quinn and Mr. Quinn is doing nothing to deflect that endorsement; after all, Mr. Quinn needs all the votes and financial support he can get.  But this is what political operatives of an especially Machiavellian, some might say sneaky, variety are for.   Somehow, the back channels have to be cultivated.  The word has to get out on the street, but only on some streets, that Mr. Emanuel is secretly backing his old pal Bruce Rauner and that support for Mr. Rauner is de facto support for Mr. Emanuel.

Can Pat Quinn pull off such a feat?   Despite his much vaunted, but now tarnishing, reputation as some sort of Mr. Clean, he has not survived nearly forty years in Chicago and Illinois politics by being some kind of choir boy.  One can be confident that Mr. Quinn has plenty of dirty tricksters in his indirect, or maybe direct, employ.   One can be confident that Mr. Quinn will try, or is trying, such a Rauner=Emanuel tactic, if only because he is almost at the point at which he will need to try anything.



See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 

Monday, April 28, 2014

QUINN ON PRECKWINKLE VS. EMANUEL, TRIPLE J, JEB BUSH, AND THE PENSION BILL

4/10/14

I took a hiatus from writing last week; I was just too busy to write and was harboring a few doubts about the whole point of the exercise.  But I was at a party last Saturday night and talked to several people whom I hadn’t seen in a while who told me how much they enjoyed my posts and asked me to assure them that I wouldn’t quit.  No coincidences, as they say, but I digress. 

At any rate, I found some time this week to write a few posts.  Almost all my musings this week were on Chicago politics; I did that because it seems like my writing on the politics of my hometown for Rant Lifestyle, a site about which I still have my misgivings, seems to sell my books…if an uptick in sales since writing for Rant is any evidence.

THE 2015 CHICAGO MAYOR’S RACE:  TONI, TONI, PLEASE BACK DOWN, YOU’LL NEVER BEAT RAHM IN THIS TOWN
Some of Toni Preckwinkle’s fans are delusional, but I hope she isn’t.  And I think I came up with a new expression for the political situation in ChicagoPax Rahmana.  Pretty good, eh?

TAKE IT TO THE BANK:  CHICAGO MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL WILL GET HIS TAX INCREASE…AND MAYBE HIS CASINO
Those who say that this whole pension bill is a stalking horse for a casino may be partially right, but property taxes are going up in Chicago anyway.

JEB BUSH IN 2016:   MOTHER KNOWS BEST
Yes, I know the Wall Street Journal editorial page has gone into the tank for this guy, but the GOP can’t be that suicidal.  Or can it?

JESSE JACKSON JR. GOES TO A NICER JAIL:  “THAT’S (NOT) THE SOUND OF THE MEN WORKING ON THE…CHAIN GANG…”
Once the glare of publicity faded, Triple J got to go to the federal housing he wanted all along.   So it goes.  But couldn’t the Jackson family have come up with a story that wasn’t quite so insulting to our intelligence?

Have a great weekend, everybody.   Blessed Holy Week and Passover.

See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 




QUINN ON THE GOVERNOR’S RACE, GIANT PUPPETS, PUTIN, GM, AND HIS NAMESAKE’S HOUSING PLAN

4/24/14

The busyness, if you will, of my schedule combined with the events of the Triduum, ruled out sending you one of these heads-up announcements last week.   But I did manage to find the time to write a few things since we last communicated.  Most were on local and state politics for the simple reason that writing on these topics sells books.  But I did touch on world politics and the car business.

WHO DOES CHICAGO MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL WANT TO BE ILLINOIS GOVERNOR?
I’m not one to complain about editing, but the editor of this piece dropped the “Who” at the beginning of the title, changing its meaning entirely.   Be that as it may, the punch line is that Mr. Emanuel may be telling the truth in this instance, and it has little, but not nothing, to do with Mr. Rauner’s ill-advised robocalls.

RAHM AND THE GIANT PUPPETS
Yet another attempt by our yuppie mayor to make us a “world class” city.  Such grotesqueries make one pine for the days of the old Stock Yards, the aroma of which my father would alternately call “fresh air” or the “smell of money.”

THE GENEVA AGREEMENT ON UKRAINE:  PUTIN HORNSWOGGLES THE WEST…AGAIN
I often wonder what Mr. Putin thinks, or thought, after meeting with the likes of Barack Obama and George Bush.  It had to be something along the lines of “This guy is the leader of the free world?  Maybe freedom isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.”

“PRODUCT INTEGRITY ORGANIZATION”?  NEW GM INDEED!
There is nothing new under the sun…especially in Detroit, it seems.

ILLINOIS GOVERNOR PAT QUINN’S HOUSING PROPOSAL:  PINING FOR ’08 AND ‘09
Shows what a short memory and an utter lack of understanding of economics can do.

Have a great rest of the week and weekend, everybody.


See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 




Sunday, December 22, 2013

WHY IS WEALTHY INSIDER BRUCE RAUNER TRYING TO TELL US HE IS A SIMPLE, MIDDLE CLASS OUTSIDER?

12/22/13

Speaking of the Republican primary for governor in Illinois  (See today’s other post, HOW DARE BILL BRADY TAKE RISKS, PUT PEOPLE TO WORK, AND ACTUALLY PUT SOMETHING ON THE PILE?), people have asked me what I think of Bruce Rauner.   Would like him to become our next governor? I don’t know, but probably not.  Why?

First, Mr. Rauner is a very rich man who, in ads that insult people’s intelligence, if such a thing is possible in modern America, pretends not to be rich.   Such chicanery is especially obnoxious to yours truly.   There is nothing wrong with being rich…if one has come about his riches in an honest and forthright manner and remains mindful of the needs of those who have not attained one’s level of riches.   Why should one be ashamed of one’s achievements…unless one is a fraud?

Second, Mr. Rauner is an insider who pretends to be an outsider.   He knows everyone in city government.  He is very close to Rahm Emanuel; Mr. Rauner made Mr. Emanuel rich and, if the press reports are to be believed, the Rauners and the Emanuels vacation together.  (The idea of vacationing with even my best friends is appalling to yours truly, but I digress.)   Before Mr. Emanuel somehow decided that being mayor of Chicago would be a good stepping stone to the job he really wants, Mr. Rauner was close to Mayor Richard M. Daley.  Mr. Rauner has a habit of getting very cozy with people in “public life” who can make him money.   One can see why, especially in this state, one who is an insider would pretend to be an outsider, but does Mr. Rauner expect us to believe such protestations?   Maybe he does, and perhaps with some justification.

Still, I suppose I could support Mr. Rauner if I could be convinced he is a legitimate venture capitalist or private equity maven, or whatever he purports to be.  However, one gets the nagging feeling that Mr. Rauner is just another guy who has made money from his political connections in this most corrupt of states.  For example, his investment business seems to have easy access to public pension money, pools of funds that unconnected people have virtually no shot at.  And one wonders in how many other ways his connections have benefited not only his getting money to invest but also his performance in investing the money.

Maybe everything Mr. Rauner does is due to his diligence, his intelligence, and his wise insights into the markets and the way the economy works.  And maybe I and my libertarian leaning friends will be contributing heavily to Elizabeth Warren’s campaign for president in 2016.  Certainly Mr. Rauner’s connections have a lot to do with his success, and that is to be expected…but how much?  One suspects a great deal; as I said a few paragraphs ago… Why should one be ashamed of one’s achievements…unless one is a fraud?

It matters little, however, what I think of Mr. Rauner.   While I don’t like to make political prediction, it’s hard to see how he won’t get the GOP nomination, if only because of the weak competition he faces.


See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 



HOW DARE BILL BRADY TAKE RISKS, PUT PEOPLE TO WORK, AND ACTUALLY PUT SOMETHING ON THE PILE?

12/22/13

Today’s (i.e., Sunday, 12/22/13’s, page 4) Chicago Tribune reports that State Senator and GOP gubernatorial candidate Bill Brady has been sued twice since 2010 in connection with about $4mm of loans on which his real estate development company has defaulted.

This is old news on which I commented the first time Mr. Brady ran for governor; see my 4/25/10 piece in the Insightful Pontificator entitled “SOME PEOPLE GET THEIR KICKS…STOMPIN’ ON A DREAM…”.   My conclusion has not changed.   If Mr. Brady had spent his life, er, feasting on the public mammary gland, like at least one of his GOP primary opponents and the current governor, he wouldn’t have gotten himself into financial trouble.   But Mr. Brady is a small business man and, like many, if not most, small business people, has had to put his personal assets on the line in order to obtain the financing necessary to pursue his dream, or at least to keep his business operating, building homes and employing people.  He has spent his life contributing to the economic pile that most politicians have spent their lives distributing as if it were somehow their own. 

My hat remains off to Mr. Brady; while I have not yet decided whom I will support in the GOP primary, or in the general election, Mr. Brady is the type of man who should be in public office…temporarily.  NO ONE should be in public office full time, permanently.  But the idea of a citizen legislator, or citizen executive, has become a quaint notion in the era of the professional barnacle on the ship of state.

Perhaps I am being uncharacteristically naive about Mr. Brady; maybe he, like at least one of his GOP opponents, is just another guy making money from his connections but is not as artful at doing so.  See today’s other post, WHY IS WEALTHY INSIDER BRUCE RAUNER TRYING TO TELL US HE IS A SIMPLE, MIDDLE CLASS OUTSIDER?  As the ever insightful H.L. Mencken (probably more than) once said

“All men are frauds.   The only difference between them is that some admit it.” 

No one in public life in the state of Illinois, of course, admits it.


See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 



Monday, September 16, 2013

ILLINOIS DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY: DALEY IS OUT; IS LISA BACK IN?

9/16/13

Now that Bill Daley has dropped out of the Democratic primary race for Illinois governor, we have to consider the ramifications of that move both for the state’s politics and for the state’s fiscal survival.



First, the politics.  We roughly six months will transpire before the March primary, so there is plenty of time for another candidate or two to enter the race.   Could one of those candidates be Attorney General Lisa Madigan?   Recall that Ms. Madigan dropped out in July claiming that her father’s remaining as House Speaker would make it difficult for her to win the race, and, if she did, to govern   She said this with a straight face as if it came as a surprise to her that her dad would not give up his job for life in order to make it easier for his daughter to take the next transitory step in a political career that the press has repeatedly assured her is heading to the very top.   See my 7/16/13 piece, LISA MADIGAN WON’TRUN FOR GOVERNOR:  WOULD YOU WANT THE JOB?

It’s easy to reflexively say “No way” when the question of Ms. Madigan’s re-entering the race comes up, but her potential re-entry deserves more thought than that.

Recall that in the aforementioned 7/16/13 piece, I gave two real reasons for Ms. Madigan’s hasty exit, or non-entrance.   First, as I explained it…

Lisa wanted a coronation, not an election.  Bill Daley made it a fight.

Whenever one is facing the incumbent office-holder in a primary, one is in for a fight.  The last person to win such a brawl in this state was Mike Howlett, the jovial but limited then Secretary of State who was able to topple Dan Walker in the Democratic gubernatorial primary in 1976, but only with the last major demonstration of the raw, dominant power of the Richard J. Daley Machine.   To say that Mike Howlett’s primary victory was Richard J. Daley’s last hurrah would not be an overstatement.  But I digress.   Daley went on to let the ever likeable Howlett hang out to dry once the bothersome Dan Walker had been dispensed with, but that is another story and another digression.  

A three way race involving the incumbent Pat Quinn (no relation), Bill Daley, and Lisa Madigan would have been tough to the point of impossibility for both of the two challengers; incumbency, even an inept incumbency, is almost always strong enough to face down two strong challengers.  Yes, Ms. Madigan had the advantage of being the only woman in the three way race and a press that simply can’t get enough of their imagined incarnation of Wonder Woman, and those factors might have been enough for her to prevail against not only the long odds against the incumbent but also Ms. Madigan’s “daddy problem,” but it would have been a long shot.  Once Daley got in, Madigan had little choice but to stay out unless she wanted something she had never experienced before…a very difficult, arduous election.





So does Daley’s leaving open a door for Lisa Madigan?   No.   Now it is not Bill Daley who is making it a tough fight; it is Pat Quinn who is making it a tough fight.  As I said only most recently in my 8/15/13 piece, PAT QUINN PUTS PAT FITZGERALD ON A VESTIGIAL COMMISSION:  IS THE GOVERNOR RUNNING THE TABLE?

Pat Quinn (no relation) may have a deserved, or otherwise, reputation as a reformer, but he is showing he didn’t get this far in Chicago and Illinois politics by spending an inordinate amount of time consulting the Marquis of Queensberry.

Pat Quinn has made some brilliant political moves which, no matter what Bill Daley says (see below), went a long way toward convincing Mr. Daley that this race was unwinnable or very close to unwinnable.  It would be equally nearly unwinnable for Lisa Madigan; she’d prefer to wait around for a coronation.

The second reason I gave in my 7/16/13 piece for Ms. Madigan not entering the race was, as I put it

The better reason is not quite as political but very simple:   Would you want to be governor of Illinois right now?   This state is in a hell of a mess, with bankruptcy looming over the fast approaching horizon.  In all likelihood, nothing will be solved before the next governor takes office.  One does not blame an ambitious pol like Ms. Madigan for not wanting to tie her dinghy to such a sinking ship.  It would be much easier, and conducive to obtaining that big job that every politician ultimately wants, to become a U.S. Senator, and that job may become available, albeit not necessarily for the asking, in 2016.

The state of Illinois is in a hell of a mess.  The daughter of the man who cannot deny a good measure of the responsibility for getting us in this mess was not the person to get us out of it.   Maybe (probably?) no one can get us out of it.  

So Lisa Madigan’s real reasons for dropping out—that it would be too difficult to win the primary and that the state is in such a fiscal mess that no sane person, and especially no sane, politically ambitious person, would want the job—remain valid.  So I don’t anticipate a dramatic Madigan re-entry into the race.   But anything can happen, and Ms. Madigan tends to believe the hagiographic press she gets.

The second aforementioned reason for Ms. Madigan not getting into the race gets us beyond the politics to the fiscal prospects for Illinois:  they stink.  Bill Daley, who, despite looking really bad for deciding to get out of the race after saying that he got into it after a great deal of thought, is no dummy.   In giving the reasons for his taking his leave, he stated

“To be honest with you, losing it wasn’t the worst of my fears. In many ways, winning it and having the commitment of five years to nine years was something I struggled with. You know, the dog catches the tire and, boom.”

A point of useful digression:   Whenever anyone uses the term “To be honest with you…” or something like it, and especially when a politician uses that term, yours truly immediately assumes that s/he is lying the rest of the time, probably all the time.  If s/he weren’t lying all the time, why would s/he have to preface anything with “To be honest with you”?  To do so is to indicate that one is not being honest when one does not use that preface.   So I believe and so I advise my students.   They need someone like me to balance this starry-eyed optimism fad.

His campaign manager, Pete Giangreco, said that Mr. Daley dropped out after considering “what it’s going to take” to dig Illinois out of its fiscal hole.

So Bill Daley, by his own words and through his campaign manager, is telling us that the state is in such bad shape that Mr. Daley can’t fix it, or at least not without an exertion of time, effort, and will that he is unable to provide.   This is coming from a man with no shortage of ego.   What does that tell you about the fiscal state of the Land of Lincoln?


 See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 


Saturday, August 17, 2013

TIO HARDIMAN IS IN THE ILLINOIS GOVERNOR’S RACE: HEY, HE’S NOT A CONVICTED FELON

8/17/13

Former Cease Fire director Tio Hardiman has announced he is throwing his hat into the Illinois gubernatorial ring.   Mr. Hardiman is likely to have a hard time gaining traction; his past includes a guilty plea to a misdemeanor domestic batter charge and an arrest for another domestic battery.  His wife dropped the charges on the latter, along with her plans for a divorce, saying she “want(ed) to work on her marriage.”   That was enough to keep Mr. Hardiman out of the hoosegow, but not enough to allow him to keep his job; Cease Fire announced just after his arrest that his contract would not be renewed and his wife’s dropping charges apparently has not persuaded them to reconsider.



When asked about his troubled past, Mr. Hardiman came up with a reply that both clarified things and drew a distinction between Mr. Hardiman and our two most recent former governors:

“The media, they like to bring up things from my past.   But I’m not a convicted felon; let me make that clear.”  (Emphasis mine)

Only in Illinois is not being a convicted felon considered a salient qualification for governor.  And only in Illinois does such a non-status make one a breath of fresh air.



See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

PAT QUINN VS. BILL DALEY: “THIS GUY DOESN’T THINK THIS IS A SHOW; HE THINKS IT’S A FIGHT!”

7/16/13

Now that Attorney General Lisa Madigan has opted out of the Illinois governor’s race (See today’s other post, LISA MADIGAN WON’TRUN FOR GOVERNOR:  WOULD YOU WANT THE JOB?), we are left, for now, with a one-on-one Democratic primary race featuring Governor Pat Quinn (no relation) and ex-White House Chief of Staff, ex-Commerce Secretary, ex-corporate bigshot, ex-everything Bill Daley, who also happens to be the son and brother of Chicago’s two longest serving mayors.

Mr. Daley’s chances in the upcoming primary have increased markedly, some might say infinitely (See 6/6/13’s “GOVERNOR BILL DALEY…SENATOR BILL DALEY.   THERE JUST WASN’T THE TIME…”), with Lisa Madigan’s exit, which was more or less forced by Mr. Daley’s entry into the race; again, see today’s other post.   While yours truly would certainly not argue that Bill Daley’s chances of becoming governor are a heck of lot better than they were yesterday, I would not count out Governor Quinn.  (See my 7/10/13 piece, PAT QUINN SUSPENDS  LEGISLATORS’ SALARIES:   FOUR MORE YEARS? and the posts to which it will refer you.)   Don’t misunderstand me; I am not predicting a Quinn victory.  I am simply NOT, for a number of reasons, among those who are saying the man has no chance at re-nomination or re-election.

Cousin Pat (not really, but I like saying that more of late) is the incumbent governor.  In the first quarter, he raised more money than either Bill Daley or Lisa Madigan.   Further, he is running a populist campaign that, while loaded with what some might consider silly, or irresponsible, stunts, like suspending legislative salaries, seems to be striking a chord with the typical voter.  Further, if Mr. Quinn can get the appropriate inspector general off the dime and quickly conduct a review, both of which are big “if”s, he can pull another such maneuver by firing the entire Metra board.  (See another post from yesterday, WE ARE SHOCKED…SHOCKED!...TO LEARN OF POLITICAL INFLUENCE AT METRA and the posts to which it will refer you.)   If you think the voters liked suspending legislative salaries, think how they will react to firing the legion of toadies, lackeys, hacks, has-beens, and wannabes that comprises the Metra board.   And Quinn just might to it.



Further, everyone speaks of Bill Daley’s fundraising prowess, but I wonder.  Now that his brother is no longer mayor and thus cannot deliver a near instant return on donors’ investments, is Bill Daley the “prolific fundraiser” that he is made out to be and indeed once was?   One suspects that Mr. Daley would not embark on this race unless he was confident he had the ability to raise a lot of money, so I might be wrong here, but even Mr. Daley has made miscalculations in his career.  Further, people don’t give political donations in this state, or just about anywhere, because they like the candidate or the party to whom they are giving.  They give because they expect a return on their investment, and the return here is not immediately obvious unless the donors are certain Mr. Daley will go to Springfield.  But they can’t be certain of that unless he gets a LOT of money; you can see the chicken and egg problem here.  While this problem is faced by just about all political candidates, it might be especially acute for Mr. Daley, given his background and his reputation as a “prolific fundraiser.”

One person that I have heard nothing about in regard to the governor’s race is the Mayor of Chicago, that idol of the consanguineous media, Rahm Emanuel.  Mr. Emanuel may protest publicly that he is not taking sides in the gubernatorial primary, but, c’mon, Mr. Emanuel staying on the sidelines of any political race?   And if you were Rahm Emanuel, would you want a potentially very strong Bill Daley to be governor?   Wouldn’t you prefer the weaker Pat Quinn?   Don’t try to argue that Mr. Emanuel has, or feel he owes, some sort of loyalty to the Daley family, which went a long way toward making him what he is today on a number of fronts.   Loyalty counts for little for Mr. Emanuel, unless it is to himself.  Ask the Clintons.

So suppose that Mr. Emanuel, secretly or perhaps not so secretly, puts out the word that he would rather not see Bill Daley in the governor’s office.  What will that do to Daley’s ability to raise money?

All that having been said, one can never factor out two things…the electorate’s general level of disappointment with Governor Quinn or the deal making skills of the Daley family.  On the latter, I smell what one might call a rat, or two rats, if I didn’t have some genuine admiration for what some might call underhanded political tactics.  See, for example, chapter 8 of my first book, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics.  What such seemingly malodorous tactics might one be seeing in the upcoming gubernatorial primary?

As of now, the Democratic gubernatorial primary is a two person race.  However, as soon as Lisa Madigan opted out of the race, talk of two other potential candidates started.  The first is state Senator Kwame Raoul of Chicago who is a something of an up and comer among black politicians.   The other is state Senator Dave Koehler, who is from Peoria.  

Hmm…

Pat Quinn’s strongest, most loyal constituency is black voters, primarily in Chicago.   Wouldn’t it be nice for Mr. Daley if Mr. Raoul, who has been known to play political ball, were to enter the race and take at least some, and probably more, of the black vote from Mr. Quinn?

Mr. Quinn is also expected to run well downstate in the primary, not so much because the Governor is so well liked in the “other Illinois” but, rather, because the Daley name is like a pox down there.   Wouldn’t it be nice for Mr. Daley if, say, Mr. Koehler or another downstater were to run and take some of that downstate vote from Mr. Quinn?

I am starting to smell something like current ward of the federal government Rod Blagojevich’s first run for governor in 2002.   His main opponent in the primary, Paul Vallas, had great strength in the black community, largely due to the relatively good job he had done as head of the Chicago Public Schools.   A third candidate, Roland Burris, an at times amiable hack from the south side, emerged to drain Mr. Vallas’ strength in the black community and thus hand the primary to Mr. Blagojevich, who eventually repaid Mr. Burris by appointing him to Barack Obama’s U.S. senate seat when Mr. Blagojevich’s back was against the federal wall, but that is another story.  Did Alderman Dick Mell (See my 7/7/13 and 7/6/13 posts, respectively, DICK MELL USED OUR MONEY TO PAY PEOPLE TO SLEEP: “THEY’RE GONNA SAY…WHAT A GUY!”  and FAREWELL, DICK MELL…SORT OF) have anything to do with Mr. Burris’s entry into the 2002 gubernatorial primary?   Are the White Sox a lousy baseball team?

Similarly, should Mr. Raoul, Mr. Koehler, and/or someone else who is black and/or from downstate enter this race, would Mr. Daley or his minions have had anything to do with his sudden desire to be governor?   Are the Cubs a lousy baseball team?

This is going to be a far more interesting race for governor, even without Lisa Madigan, than most people think.


See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 



Thursday, June 13, 2013

BILL DALEY AND THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE: THE BROTHER ALSO RISES?

6/13/13

Bill Daley has formed an exploratory committee for a run for governor in 2014.   Forming an exploratory committee permits a candidate to raise funds for a race but is not a formal declaration of candidacy.   So Mr. Daley is not yet in the race but, as he said

“I’m in this race, okay?  Yes, it’s an exploratory committee because that’s how you start.  You don’t run, you don’t walk.”



If Mr. Daley were not a politician, I would be inclined to say that we have to take the man at his word.   But Mr. Daley is, after all, in the politics business and, as I have said on numerous occasions, prevaricating is at least as easy as telling the truth for those in that business.   Further, it’s difficult to determine what the above statement means.   He’s in the race, but he didn’t add the words “to stay” and didn’t say if he intends to stop walking and start running.   One doesn’t know how carefully parsed Mr. Daley’s words were, and it wouldn’t matter much because of the nature of Mr. Daley’s line of work. 

Yours truly’s thoughts on this latest development have not changed since I wrote the now seminal “GOVERNOR BILL DALEY…SENATOR BILL DALEY.   THERE JUST WASN’T THE TIME…” a week ago.   I’m surprised, or at least I would be surprised if Mr. Daley’s announcement meant more than it apparently means.   Bill Daley is a cautious, calculating man.  As a Daley, he avoids elections in which the outcome is not a foregone conclusion.   The politics of a Daley run for governor don’t make much sense, at least at this juncture.   It would seem he would stand no chance in a three way primary with a powerhouse woman candidate (Lisa Madigan) in the race and the incumbent governor.   The Daley name, which only briefly, during Rich Daley’s first few terms as mayor, had any cachet downstate, has been badly tarnished, and not only downstate, by the missteps of Rich Daley’s last few terms, most saliently the parking meter deal and the general growing perception that city government was something of an ATM for Daley pals during those last few terms.   The polls I have seen have shown Mr. Daley far behind Governor Pat Quinn and even further behind Attorney General Lisa Madigan, who people are assuming is an all but declared candidate.   So why is Mr. Daley looking like he is going to run?



Perhaps, as John Kass of the Chicago Tribune indicated last week, Mr. Daley knows something we don’t know, i.e., that Lisa Madigan has decided not to run.  Maybe Mr. Daley is trying to smoke out Lisa Madigan, trying to force her to show her hand.  If she gets in, he can still get out.   Perhaps at the age of 64, Mr. Daley thinks this is his last chance for high, or any, elected office, so he is throwing caution to the wind…my least favorite and least likely explanation.  Or maybe Mr. Daley is not motivated by political calculation but by a sense of duty and genuinely feels he is the man that can solve our state’s fiscal problems and is called to do so before all is lost.   One would like to ascribe such noble motives to Mr. Daley; he is one of the most competent and, from what I have seen, one of the more noble politicians out there.  But he is still a politician and the adjective “noble” is difficult to fit with the noun “politician” under any circumstances.   If this is his motivation, however, my hat is off to him.

There is always the crazy idea, that I advanced last week, that Mr. Daley will eschew the primary altogether and run as an independent, especially if Pat Quinn somehow emerges as the Democratic nominee.   This notion is interesting and tantalizing, indeed, but still quite unlikely.  Should it happen, though, you heard it here first.

I know no more than what I read in the papers.  As I said last week, I don’t know Mr. Daley; I have never even met Mr. Daley, much to the detriment of both of us.   All I know is that the next few months will be interesting.

One of the most interesting aspects of a Daley candidacy is whether he will be able to raise the kind of money people assume he can raise.   When his brother was mayor and controlled the levers of power, raising money was no problem; see my comments two paragraphs prior regarding Chicago’s government’s becoming something of an ATM for Daley pals.  But Rich Daley can’t do much for people any more; the supposed tough guys and hardened pols who used to bow and scrape before him are now bowing and scraping before Rahm Emanuel.  Mr. Emanuel is the one handing out the contracts and raising the dough from the grateful.  If Mr. Emanuel, who has raised the normal political practice of not doing anything for anybody that doesn’t benefit him to an art form, decides that there is no reason any longer to help the Daley family, could he indicate to potential donors that writing Bill Daley a check might not only not curry the Mayor’s favor but might engender his wrath?   Why would Mr. Emanuel want to help out the Daley family which, except for John, is out of power, when he still needs the help, or at least the acquiescence, of the Speaker Mike Madigan?   Personal loyalty?   Gratitude?   C’mon!   We’re talking Rahm Emanuel here!

If Mr. Daley suddenly finds potential donors asking “What ya done for me lately?” the implications for his bid for governor are obvious.  And Mr. Emanuel might be the man who induces potential donors to ask that question.   Then the Daleys will know they backed the wrong horse in 2011, but will only be able to watch helplessly as they fade into irrelevance.   Some mistakes in politics are indeed irreversible.

See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics.