Showing posts with label Jesse Jackson Jr.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jesse Jackson Jr.. Show all posts

Monday, April 28, 2014

QUINN ON PRECKWINKLE VS. EMANUEL, TRIPLE J, JEB BUSH, AND THE PENSION BILL

4/10/14

I took a hiatus from writing last week; I was just too busy to write and was harboring a few doubts about the whole point of the exercise.  But I was at a party last Saturday night and talked to several people whom I hadn’t seen in a while who told me how much they enjoyed my posts and asked me to assure them that I wouldn’t quit.  No coincidences, as they say, but I digress. 

At any rate, I found some time this week to write a few posts.  Almost all my musings this week were on Chicago politics; I did that because it seems like my writing on the politics of my hometown for Rant Lifestyle, a site about which I still have my misgivings, seems to sell my books…if an uptick in sales since writing for Rant is any evidence.

THE 2015 CHICAGO MAYOR’S RACE:  TONI, TONI, PLEASE BACK DOWN, YOU’LL NEVER BEAT RAHM IN THIS TOWN
Some of Toni Preckwinkle’s fans are delusional, but I hope she isn’t.  And I think I came up with a new expression for the political situation in Chicago:  Pax Rahmana.  Pretty good, eh?

TAKE IT TO THE BANK:  CHICAGO MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL WILL GET HIS TAX INCREASE…AND MAYBE HIS CASINO
Those who say that this whole pension bill is a stalking horse for a casino may be partially right, but property taxes are going up in Chicago anyway.

JEB BUSH IN 2016:   MOTHER KNOWS BEST
Yes, I know the Wall Street Journal editorial page has gone into the tank for this guy, but the GOP can’t be that suicidal.  Or can it?

JESSE JACKSON JR. GOES TO A NICER JAIL:  “THAT’S (NOT) THE SOUND OF THE MEN WORKING ON THE…CHAIN GANG…”
Once the glare of publicity faded, Triple J got to go to the federal housing he wanted all along.   So it goes.  But couldn’t the Jackson family have come up with a story that wasn’t quite so insulting to our intelligence?

Have a great weekend, everybody.   Blessed Holy Week and Passover.

See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 




Thursday, August 15, 2013

JESSE AND SANDI JACKSON: JUST HOW CLAIRVOYANT WAS H.L. MENCKEN?

8/15/13

Jesse Jackson, Jr., affectionately, or otherwise, known as “Triple J” in these parts, and his co-schemer and wife Sandi Jackson, were sentenced yesterday for their crimes involving misuse of campaign funds and failure to mention to the IRS their use of such funds for such vital campaign necessities as moose heads, furs, Eddie Van Halen guitars, Michael Jackson memorabilia, and a $43,000 watch.   Yours truly contends that anyone who spends $43 grand on a watch deserves to go to jail on general principle, but I digress.

As regular readers know, I have been deeply intrigued by this story for a long time.  (See, inter alia




and posts in a former blog to which they will direct you.)   So the sentencing of these two felonious finaglers merits some comment from yours truly.



First, the sentences seemed a little light:   a year for Sandi Jackson and two and a half years for Triple J, both far under the maxima under federal guidelines.   If the Chicago Sun-Times Natasha Korecki and Lynn Sweet, neither of whom could be considered hostile to the Jacksons, are to be believed, at least Triple J agrees that he got off easy.  According to Ms. Sweet and Ms. Korecki in today’s (8/15/13, page 4) Sun-Times…

Jackson, Jr., 48, who had been blowing his nose and sobbing during his remarks to the judge, appeared to break into a half-grin as the news of the sentence settled in.

And it got better for the Jackson.  Rather than both going immediately to jail (and why has it taken this long?), they will go in sequence, with Jesse going first and Sandi going after him.  And they got to decide the order of their incarcerations.   Who else gets such treatment?

Still, yours truly is kind of surprised that Sandi Jackson got any jail time at all.   It’s not that I don’t think she deserved it.  But so much of the Chicago media and political establishments had bought into the “poor, poor put-upon Sandi Jackson” line of baloney, along with the “these kids need their parents” pile of horse dump that I feared, and suspected, that Judge Amy Berman Jackson (no relation) had drunken the kool-aid.  Fortunately, she didn’t.




Second, Triple J’s still vague emotional/mental malady was taken for the line of cattle detritus that it appeared to be.  Prosecutor Matt Graves, referring to Mr. Jackson’s purported illness, stated

“It’s quite clear there’s no ‘there’ there.”

Some might reply that, of course, Mr. Graves would say that; after all, he was the prosecutor in the case.  But Judge Jackson also gave the mental health angle no credence, pointing out that there was nothing sudden about Mr. and Mrs. Jackson’s, er, lapses of judgment, as would be the case if their thievery sprung from Mr. Jackson’s mental condition.   This was, the Judge pointed out, a continuing pattern of pilferage, and stated that there was

“…only once conclusion, and that is that you (Triple J) knew better.”

Yours truly is no mental health professional, but neither are the vast majority of people commenting on Triple J’s medical maladies.   Further, none of the mental health professionals the Jacksons were able to produce were all that convincing.   Maybe those of us who are, to put it mildly, suspicious of Mr. Jackson’s claims of the psychiatric equivalent of “the devil made me do it” are wrong.  Maybe Mr. Jackson really is sick.   If that really is the case, one suspects that whatever it is that Mr. Jackson has will clear up quickly…very quickly.  In fact, one suspects that his afflictions vanished as soon as his sentence was pronounced.   But they may make a temporary comeback if (when, probably) Mr. and Mrs. Jackson prepare their appeal.


Third, we have been hearing much about “wasted talent” and “a promising career” of “a young man who had the ability to go all the way” being “thrown away,” and other such bullroar from those die-hard liberals in the local and national media who “just wanna believe,” and can’t be convinced otherwise.  

Yours truly never bought into this hype.  Triple J was at best a passable Congressperson, at worst a lazy, entitled son of privilege who was clearly in over his head.   Until recently, he had a very good Congressional attendance record, but one wonders what he did other than attend.  In his 17 years in Congress, he never managed to win a committee chairmanship, despite the sycophancy most of his fellow Congressman showed him due to his last name and the perception that it carries a lot of weight with black voters.  He did manage to win a seat on the Appropriations Committee, but his record of achievement in that all-important Committee, like his overall record in Congress, was slight, at best.   He made a lot of noise about what came to be seen as his pet project, a third Chicago airport in distant Peotone, but there is still no airport growing from the cornfields in that bucolic burg.  He also proposed that each school child in America be given an i-Pad, courtesy of you, the taxpayer.   Hmm…perhaps we should be grateful that JJJ was unable to get anything done.   Even his much lauded oratory was only so much fulmination, much art and little substance, jargon and catch-lines amounting to nothing but pap and pabulum for the already converted.

When Mr. Jackson first came to Congress in 1995, all we heard about was what a terrific, wonderful, super hero of a young man he was, truly outstanding, upstanding, and all around beatific in every conceivable way.  It seemed to yours truly that such talk was just another orgiastic manifestation of the “just gotta believe” phenomenon among starry-eyed liberals with not even a passing familiarity with life on the ground in Mr. Jackson’s 2nd Congressional District.

We had heard nearly the same kinds of hosannas about Mel Reynolds, Mr. Jackson’s predecessor as Congressman in the 2nd District, when Mr. Reynolds defeated Gus Savage in 1992 to assume the seat.   Mr. Reynolds was described in nearly the same beatific tones as Mr. Jackson.   Mr. Reynolds was a Rhodes Scholar and he was….,well, given Mr. Reynolds’ thin resume and an inability to talk in anything but empty platitudes or understand the core of any issue, no one could come up with anything other than his Rhodes Scholarship.   In fact, Mr. Reynolds’ only qualification for Congress, let alone the sainthood his true believers seemed to be recommending him for, was that he was not his race-baiting, anti-Semitic predecessor Gus Savage.  

Mr. Reynolds went on to develop, or maybe just further indulge from a position of power, proclivities toward teenage girls, especially Catholic school girls (“I think I just won the lottery,” Mr. Reynolds response when he was told by what turned out to be an informant that the informant could set him up with a girl who attended a Catholic high school, is perhaps Mr. Reynolds’ most famous utterance, but I digress.) and lie to law enforcement about it.   Consequently, he was provided lodging in a federal facility  and was replaced by the equally underqualified Mr. Jackson.  The same people who just three years before were telling us how terrific Mr. Reynolds was began telling us that we had been visited by an even more celestial personage in Mr. Jackson.  I never believed it because there was never any basis for it other than the “just gotta believe” attitude that affects those whose minds are so open their brains fall out.   But Mr. Jackson’s obsequiants may have had a point; Mr. Jackson had at least one more qualification than Mr. Reynolds:  not only was Mr. Jackson not Gus Savage; he also was not Mel Reynolds.  As H.L. Mencken, one of the truly great figures in American history said,

“An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will make a better soup.”



Fourth, there is much talk already about a Triple J comeback.   Don’t discount the possibility.  Young Mr. Jackson is not yet fifty and he’ll be out in about a year and a half.   He managed to win re-election by a landslide in 2012 despite his absence from both Congress and the campaign trail in the wake of suspicions regarding his dalliances with former Governor Rod Blagojevich about Barack Obama’s old senate seat and, of course, the onset of his mysterious maladies.  

Further, as H.L. Mencken also said in a widely misquoted observation…

“No one in this world, so far as I know—and I have researched the records for years, and employed agents to help me—has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”

So we have not yet heard the last from Jesse Jackson, Jr. and his accomplice, Sandi Jackson.   As Mr. Mencken also said, perhaps gazing at the 2nd District from far off Baltimore

“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.”

And, perhaps having a vision of the not yet born Jesse and Sandi Jackson, Mr. Mencken also observed

“Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is sort of an advance auction sale of stolen goods.”


Mr. and Mrs. Jackson are living, breathing, walking, talking manifestations of the wisdom of Mr. Mencken.


See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 


Friday, April 12, 2013

ROBIN KELLY AND STANLEY MOORE: THE LADY AND THE TRAMP…OR TWO PEAS IN A POD?

4/12/13

Featured prominently in both Chicago newspapers this morning was the stunning news that Stanley Moore, whom the relevant ward and township committeemen chose to replace Bill Beavers on the Cook County Board (See my 3/22/13 post, COMMISSIONER BILL BEAVERS:   HOG WITH THE BIG NUTS, REAL LIFE FRANK PANTANGELI, OR BOTH? and the posts to which it will refer you.), has a few ethics problems.   Specifically, Mr. Moore was fined $3,000 by the state of Illinois’ Executive Ethics Committee for campaigning for the state legislature while on the clock when he was working for the Illinois Department of Transportation.  He paid $2,900 of that fine only after he was being considered for the County Board post, pleading poverty until then.   Note that Mr. Moore has been convicted of no crimes; the Ethics Committee is an extra-judicial body, if you will.



So a long time Cook County political hanger-on gets fined for campaigning for office while on the public payroll.   What, other than Mr. Moore’s actually getting fined for this transgression, is news?

Throughout the same week on which we heard this stunning news on Mr. Moore, we read breathless media commentary about Robin Kelly, who went through the electoral motions Tuesday to trounce her Democratic opponent and was sworn in yesterday as the replacement for the disgraced Jesse Jackson, Jr. (“Triple J”) as the 2nd Congressional District’s representative in the U.S. House.   It is all, according to the media, sweetness and light with Ms. Kelly.   She is new, different, and refreshing.   She will change things in the 2nd District.

But wait a minute…  

Robin Kelly had nearly the same ethical problems as Mr. Moore.   While she was working for State Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias, who himself has something of a questionable past, she was campaigning to succeed her boss…while on the clock at the Treasurer’s office.   But we don’t hear much about that…she is new, smart, brilliant, compassionate, honest, etc., etc., etc….the same kind of hoping against hope, gormless bullroar we heard about Triple J and about Mel Reynolds before him.   Both left Congress in disgrace, Triple J with money problems, Mel Reynolds with teenage girl problems.   But when each of these nonentities assumed office, both with thin resumes but either a big name or a big academic pedigree, we were told by their shameless media cheerleaders that they were new, smart, brilliant, honest, etc., etc….and none of it was true.   They were both nothing but corrupt pols and we had no reason to think otherwise…other than the distastefulness, or worse, of their predecessors.  



The same is true of Robin Kelly.   There is nothing in her record of “public service,” which amounts to one spot at the public trough after another, while playing the types of games endemic to Cook County politics, to indicate that she is anything but yet another hack looking for a better place at the trough from which she can enrich herself and/or advance her career as some kind of self-imagined messiah for the benighted masses who just can’t seem to figure out the right way to live.   (See my 2/27/13 piece,  MR. SUNSHINE ON ROBIN KELLY, DEBBIE HALVORSON, AND THE ILLINOIS 2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT RESULTS)   Yet the media just want to believe because, one supposes, Ms. Kelly is relatively young, relatively attractive, and unceasingly spouts the liberal line on guns, taxes, and the constant necessity for more government.   Her life has been one of using other people’s money to prove her compassion and advance her career.   The same could be said for each of her predecessors…and look how they turned out.

No one is excusing Mr. Moore’s ethical transgressions.  But why is he singled out for media derision while Ms. Kelly, who is not in any substantial way different from Mr. Moore, suddenly worthy of unceasing, unflinching, and unthinking adulation?

Someone like yours truly whose memory exceeds the last few months or years, and thus has heard it all before, will reserve judgment on this latest media darling.   Perhaps she will prove to be the most ethical, the most effective, and the all around most wonderful politician to come out of the 2nd District (a very low bar) or the Land of Lincoln (an only slightly higher bar).   A thinking person doubts it, given Ms. Kelly’s at the very best mediocre, same old same old, record.   But, believe it or not, I would be delighted if she proves me wrong; the long suffering residents of the 2nd District badly need a break.



 See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

MR. SUNSHINE ON ROBIN KELLY, DEBBIE HALVORSON, AND THE ILLINOIS 2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT RESULTS

2/27/13

Lifelong bureaucrat and political hanger-on Robin Kelly won the Democratic primary, and effective election, in the race to succeed the disgraced Jesse Jackson, Jr. (See my 2/16/13 post, LET’S FINALLY TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT JESSE AND SANDI JACKSON)  in Illinois’ second Congressional District.  

Ms. Kelly campaigned almost exclusively on the issue of gun violence, despite the District’s other problems, including a foreclosure rate in its Chicago and suburban precincts that is the highest in the state.  Robin Kelly appears to really believe that we can “end the plague of gun violence” simply by passing more stringent gun laws.  (See my 2/24/13 post IT’S NOT GARRY McCARTHY’S FAULT.)  She won the race with the help of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s pro-gun control USA PAC, which spent $2.2 million on pro-Kelly advertising.  She apparently successfully portrayed the race as a Davidic race against the Goliathine NRA, which stayed out of the race, though its Illinois affiliate did spend a relative pittance supporting one of her opponents, Debbie Halvorson.   (More on Ms. Halvorson below.)  Ms. Kelly also had the tacit support of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel.   Unlike past great Chicago mayors, like Richard J. Daley and Tony Cermak, the last two have eschewed publicly supporting candidates in primaries, preferring to sneak around and maintain plausible deniability, but I digress.  Robin Kelly also has had problems with, er, sloppiness, similar to those of her two predecessors.   Her lackadaisical approach to the rules manifested itself primarily in recordkeeping when she unsuccessfully campaigned for State Treasurer when her time sheets showed that she was working…for the State Treasurer.  Ms. Kelly evidently has no problem with being paid, by you, while she campaigns for her next spot at the public trough.  

Ms. Kelly’s big victory (52% of the vote in a very crowded field) once again confirms the wisdom of one of yours truly’s idols, H.L. Mencken, who observed

“No one in this world, so far as I know—and I have researched the records for years, and employed agents to help me—has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”

Perhaps the low turnout (15% in Chicago and suburban Cook) limits the reach of the application of this latest example of Mr. Mencken’s acuity of mind.   Then again, the low turnout may confirm Mr. Mencken’s astuteness, but I digress again.

Clearly, there were better candidates in the race.  Newly elected State Senator Napoleon Harris, who has actually done a few things in life beyond feeding at the public mammary gland, comes immediately to mind.  But he was only a minor candidate who dropped out rather early, and even the so-called major candidates never really had a chance once Michael Bloomberg came in with his money, Mayor Emanuel starting throwing his weight around (behind the scenes, of course) and Toi Hutchinson dropped out.  See my 2/18/12 piece,  2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT PRIMARY IN ILLINOIS:  ROBIN KELLY-- BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE?

One of those candidates who never had a chance, though she basked in the delusion that she did, just as she basked in the delusion that she could have defeated Mr. Jackson in the 2012 primary, was former Congressperson and State Senator Debbie Halvorson, of whom I wrote extensively in my 2/18/12 post.   As a somewhat close observer of this race, I heard Ms. Halvorson speak a few times and read some of what she spoke.   If following this race did nothing else, it did explain quite a few things about Illinois politics to this long time observer of that curious and fascinating endeavor.   Ms. Halvorson was perhaps the least impressive candidate in the race, certainly the least impressive of the major candidates.   Watching Ms. Halvorson in action could almost lead one to the conclusion that the Democrats of the 2nd District should be excused for nominating Robin Kelly, or at least were smart not to have nominated Ms. Halvorson.  Ms. Halvorson was once Majority Leader of the Illinois Senate!  O tempora, o mores!  That such an unimpressive candidate, shallow thinker, and reflexive flip-flopper could actually have been the Majority Leader of the Illinois Senate explains a lot about the sorry condition of the state of Illinois.


One final thing.  Now that Ms. Kelly has been effectively elected to Congress, we are already hearing about how a “new era” has broken out for the 2nd District, that she will be “a breath of fresh air” and a source of “refreshing change” for the District.  

One would hope that the cheerleading media would refrains from such hagiography until we learn more about Robin Kelly, especially about how her aforementioned laxness of attitude concerning campaigning on the public dime might manifest itself once she gets to Washington.   Why?   Because we heard the same things about Jesse Jackson, Jr. when he replaced Mel Reynolds and we heard the same things about Mel Reynolds when he replaced Gus Savage in 1993.   Though Mr. Jackson did not share Mr. Reynolds weakness for pubescent girls, and Mr. Reynolds did not share Mr. Savage’s apparent anti-Semitism and strong distaste for those who did not share his racial background, Mr. Reynolds and Mr. Jackson were both moral pygmies who brought disgrace to their district, their city, their state, their country, and their families.   The initial breathless adulation did not pan out, and the hosanna choruses in the press that greeted both gentlemen wound up looking worse than foolish.  One would think the media cheerleaders would have the decency, or at least the good sense, to go easy on the bowing before Ms. Kelly until things develop a bit.  


See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 



Thursday, February 21, 2013

A SORT OF DEFENSE OF SANDI JACKSON

2/21/13

When we seek insight into the case of former Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. and his wife, former absentee Alderman Sandi Jackson, it is sometimes best to eschew the opinions of the journalists, the pols, and even the bloggers and take a look at what the people in Mr. Jackson’s district, and Ms. Jackson’s ward, are saying.   To that end, consider the opinion, as recorded on page 3 of the 2/21/13 Chicago Sun-Times, of Linda Wetherspoon, who is 54 years old and has lived in the 2nd District, and (I think) the 7th Ward since she was twenty:

“He (Mr. Jackson) knew better.   But I feel terrible for Sandi.  She’s a woman.  She’s a mother.  I’m not excusing her.  But they usually don’t charge both husband and wife, because of the kids…So I don’t think it’s right the feds charged Sandi.   They really had it in for the Jacksons.”


Regular, or even casual, readers of this blog know that I don’t “feel terrible” for Sandi Jackson and have less than no sympathy for her.   See, inter alia, my most recent post on l’affaire Jackson, 2/16/13’s LET’S FINALLY TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT JESSE AND SANDI JACKSON.   Yet I think Ms. Wetherspoon has a point.   The U.S. Attorney generally doesn’t charge both husband and wife.   The most glaring example of this is the case of the Rod and Patti Blagojevich.   Perhaps the lawyers know better, but it seems to the average citizen, and to those of us who follow these things very closely, that Patti was up to her neck in Rod’s schemes.   Look at all the real estate deals in which those who curried Rod’s favor, most notably Tony Rezko, used Patti as a co-listing agent and paid her big commissions in exchange for very little.  In fact, there was testimony that agents who had such listings, and did almost all the work, were pressured to put Patti on as a listing agent, and thus split their commissions with her, when she did little or nothing on the deals.   It seems that Patti Blagojevich served as little more than a conduit for funneling money to her husband, the congressman and later the governor.  


Perhaps Mrs. Blagojevich did nothing illegal and the suspicious commissions from friends of the governor only appeared to be as hinky as they did.   Maybe there wasn’t enough evidence to charge Mrs. Blagojevich with crimes while there was plenty of evidence to charge Mrs. Jackson.   Or maybe Mrs. Blagojevich was a hardworking real estate agent who earned every dime she earned and never used her connections to get a listing, the last being as likely as yours truly’s managing the triumphant campaign of the Blagojevich/Jackson ticket when these two emerge from the hoosegow and run as a team for the nation’s highest offices. 

For whatever reason, though, Patti Blagojevich was not even charged with a crime.   Yes, she has young children, but so does Sandi Jackson.   So why the disparity of treatment?  I don’t blame people like Ms. Wetherspoon for being more than little suspicious of the government’s motives.

In all likelihood, Sandi Jackson will do no time and will get off with the legal equivalent of a slap on the wrist, largely due to the “she is a woman with young children” argument.   Still, being charged with a felony is a big deal.   One wonders…why Sandi Jackson and not Patti Blagojevich?



See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 

Saturday, February 16, 2013

LET’S FINALLY TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT JESSE AND SANDI JACKSON

2/16/13

Former 2nd District Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. and his wife, former 7th Ward absentee Alderman Sandi Jackson will plead guilty to federal charges, he of misusing $750,000 in campaign funds and she to “filing incorrect tax returns.”   Mrs. Jackson is also believed to be the “Co-conspirator 1” referred to by the feds in the criminal charges against her husband.  Mr. Jackson will probably do some time, maybe two or three years; Mrs. Jackson will in all likelihood walk with a slap on the wrist.   Monetary restitution will also have to be made; good luck with that.

I have written extensively on the travails of the Jacksons, most recently in my February 7 post JUST HOW DID SANDI JACKSON END UP UNDER THAT BUS?, which will in turn direct you to earlier commentaries on this disgraced couple.   The dual admissions of guilt have led to further observations on their defenestration:



--Buried in both the Chicago Tribune and Sun-Times stories is the $473,000 in payments made by campaign funds for Jesse Jackson, Jr. (affectionately or otherwise known as “Triple J”) to “a consulting firm run by his wife,” as the Tribune put it.   Neither paper mentioned the name of the firm, Donatella & Associates, as I did in my February 7 post.   As I mentioned then, it seems to this admitted non-lawyer that it is those payments that hold the key to the case.  As far as I can tell, those payments are not a subject of the guilty plea; the charges against Triple J are for spending campaign funds on personal items not even remotely related to campaigning.

Is there more to come as the feds dig deeper into the Donatella payments?  I doubt it, and that’s a shame; it seems like that is where the real meat of this case is.   One wonders why the feds aren’t delving more deeply into Donatella, which leads to my next point.

--Why did it take so long for this case to develop?   Most people even remotely in touch with Chicago politics have known of, or had strong suspicions about, Jesse and Sandi’s financial finagling for years.  Triple J routinely raised hundred of thousands of dollars in campaign funds even though he could not possibly lose in his district; he won his last election while undergoing inpatient treatment for his mysterious malady, the intensity of which increased with the intensity of the feds’ probing, and without making a single campaign appearance.   He wasn’t spending the money on his own campaign and he wasn’t excessively generous in his support of his colleagues’ campaigns.

As the Tribune said

“Long before charges were filed, some raised questions about eh congressman’s use of campaign funds.”
This contention would be true if the Tribune has substituted “many” or “most” for “some,” but I digress.  

These machinations had been going on for years and, as the local papers said in today’s articles, they were “egregious,” “stunning,” and “staggering.”  So why did it take so long to throw the book at the Jacksons?

There has long been an unwritten rule around Chicago, and the country, that you don’t touch the Jacksons.  In fact, there are some who would argue that the Blagojevich investigation was stopped when it was stopped because it was getting too close to Triple J, though I don’t subscribe to that argument.   It seems that too many people, including

  • naïve, just want to believe, liberals,
  • the local, and especially the national press.
  • local and national pols looking for votes who assume that to offend the Jacksons will cost them black votes, and, especially,
  • corporate America, which finds it much easier to deal with Triple J, his wife, and his father than to actually get to understand the average black man in the street.  After all, the Jacksons, and especially Jesse Jackson, Sr., will come up to see them in Lake Forest; they don’t even have to go down into “those neighborhoods” to assuage their usually, but not always, misplaced sense of guilt.   Corporate America has too much invested in the Jacksons to throw it all away just because two of them are criminals.

It is this “don’t touch the Jacksons” rule that has kept the feds away from the Jacksons until Sandi and Triple J’s ineptness made doing so impossible.


--The list of things that Triple J spent the pilfered funds on would be comical if it weren’t so pathetic…

·        Mink reversible parka                          $1,500
·        Bruce Lee memorabilia                        $10,105
·        Michael Jackson memorabilia               $22,700
·        Wristwatch                                          $43,000

And that is only a partial list.  

Even if young Jackson had spent his own money on such items, it would show, in this writer’s opinion, a serious lack of character or at least an egregious lack of judgment.   Why in the world would anyone spent $43,000 on a watch even if he "had the money"?   What kind of fop would spend anything on a mink reversible parka?   Who needs either senseless bauble?   What kind of popinjay wants either senseless bauble?   How empty must one’s life be if one tries to fill its gaping void with such silliness?

--Triple J continues to insist that he is guilty of “mistakes,” “errors in judgment,” and “improper decisions.”  As I said in my 11/22/12 post on the now defunct Rant Political, JESSE JACKSON, JR. RESIGNS:  DON’T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU IN THE KEISTER ON THE WAY OUT, to which the aforementioned link will lead you

Taking a left turn when one meant to take a right turn is a mistake.   Cheating on one’s wife with comely cocktail waitresses who moonlights as bikini models, using campaign funds for personal reasons, and dealing with corrupt governors for Senatorial seats are moral failings and ethical transgressions.  But our society seems to see no differences between mere mental oversights and horrendous violations of long established and well grounded moral codes.  Then we wonder why people commit so many of the latter.

Now that the Congressman is about to plead guilty, we can add to those moral failings and ethical transgressions admitted crimes.  But in Jesse Jackson’s world, and, sadly, in our modern world, these are only “mistakes” or, at worst “errors in judgment.”  O temporal, o mores!


--One would hope that the admission of guilt by Mr. and Mrs. Jackson would put an end to the campaign by the local and national media to portray Sandi Jackson as the poor, put upon spouse and Triple J as a character in a modern Greek tragedy, an Olympian who fell from the sky.   One would be foolish to harbor such a hope.



While yours truly don’t like to make predictions, it is not difficult to see a story line developing that poor, poor Sandi was guilty, really, only of signing as an innocent co-filer Triple J’s fictitious tax returns.   As for Triple J, the press just can’t get over the heat induced swooning this utter fraud seems to spark in their hearts.   For example, in the Chicago Sun-Times editorial in the wake of the guilty pleas, the paper, while pointing out Mr. Jackson’s obvious “misplaced sense of entitlement,” just had to tell us

He was smart and charismatic.  He worked hard.

Triple J was and is not smart.  Smart people don’t spend other people’s money on $43,000 watches and do little to cover their tracks.  Smart people don’t engage in corruption so naked that, even with the untouchability conferred on him by his father, prosecution of Congressman Jackson became inevitable.

Triple J didn’t work hard; he took his duties lightly and did only the minimum to get by, preferring to spend his time attending to such vital matters as buying Michael Jackson’s fedoras and Eddie Van Halen’s guitars and pursuing a quixotic, yet headline grabbing, quest for a “third Chicago airport” that no one seems to want, let alone need.  As I said in the aforementioned 11/22/12 post  JESSE JACKSON, JR. RESIGNS:  DON’T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU IN THE KEISTER ON THE WAY OUT

Jesse Jackson, Jr. was a Congressman of little accomplishment.  In his seventeen years in Congress, he did little more than make an occasional decent speech, accept undeserved congratulations, and plot to gain his next political office.   This made him no different from most politicians, but young Mr. Jackson didn’t even manage to gain a committee chairmanship or a seat on the Appropriations committee for his otherwise pointless and unproductive efforts.   Perhaps this was because Mr. Jackson was so focused, or some might say obsessed, with the notion of a “third” Chicago airport in the far southern reaches of his district, the merits of which were very limited at best and a reflection of the corruption that pervades Chicago politics at worst.

As I said before, the unwritten rule that one doesn’t criticize the Jacksons continues to pervade coverage of this nonentity.


--According to the Sun-Times, when Jesse Jackson, Sr. was asked whether he was embarrassed or surprised by his son’s “lavish (Yours truly would say idiotic.) spending,”

He cut off the conversation, telling the Sun-Times “I can’t comment on any of that.  I could not and should not.  I don’t know enough about it.”

This sounds like the Reverend Jackson’s version of Ralph Cramden’s “Huminahuminahumina.”   One wonders why the elder Jackson has so little to say about the spending propensities of his son.   Could this be a case of the apple’s not falling far from the tree?

--Finally, while organized labor has been very generous to Triple J, contributing over $1 million to his admitted personal piggy bank, er, sorry, campaign funds, over the years, Congressman Jackson’s largest single contributor has been Exelon, the holding company for, among other things, Chicago’s local electric utility.  Exelon’s PAC and employees have contributed more than $85 thousand to young Mr. Jackson.

Exelon’s generosity reinforces my earlier point about corporate America’s large investment in the Jackson family as a convenient way to make it look like it “cares” about the average black consumer.  

Exelon’s munificence also tells a story as old as Chicago politics, and it is doubtless not unique to these parts.   The local utilities in this town have always been cozy with the political powers that be; after all, it is the politicians who ultimately decide what the utilities can charge their customers and thus the profits they can remit to their shareholders.   It has long been routine for the local utilities to make room on their payrolls for people who were “recommended” for jobs by various ward bosses; the utilities were mere extensions of the city, county, and state payrolls as patronage havens.   As an example, when I was in my teens, the Ward Secretary (after the Ward Committeeman, the most powerful political official in the Ward) in my home 19th Ward was one Tom Ryan…who worked for what everyone called “the gas company,” perhaps due to its unfortunate name at the time “People’s Gas.”  (I have at least one great story about the 1975 19th Ward aldermanic race to succeed Silent Tommy Fitz, Ryan’s boss; I’ll have to save it for later in the interests of time and relevance.)   Tom Ryan was far from alone.   The point is that the coziness of the utilities with the pols goes on to this day, but nowadays the pols are apparently more expensive than a few spots on the payroll for political hangers-on.


The truth about the Jacksons has long been known but rarely been spoken.   One wonders if even the guilty pleas of Triple J and his wife will finally permit the truth to come out anywhere but at Mighty Quinn on Politics and Money.


See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics.