Sunday, September 8, 2013

THE MIDWAY PRIVATIZATION DEAL’S COLLAPSE: “(RAHM EMANUEL) ALWAYS MADE MONEY FOR HIS PARTNERS…”?

9/8/13

As hard as it might be for yours truly to say this, the recent collapse of the Midway Airport privatization deal might be just what Mayor Emanuel and his floor leader, Alderman Patrick O’Connor (40th), say it is:  a failure of a deal that just didn’t make sense from the taxpayers’ standpoint and that wasn’t going to get any better due to the absence of competition in the bidding process in the wake of one of the last two competitor’s dropping out of the process.  

Yes, the city’s Chief Financial Officer, Lois Scott, who quarterbacked this Hindenburg of a project, has her problems; the mutual back scratcher she recommended for the job of city comptroller, Amer Ahmad, has been indicted for placing his hand in the cookie jar back in Ohio and apparently was the subject of federal curiosity even as Ms. Scott wrote Mr. Ahmad a glowing recommendation.   Perhaps as problematical for Ms. Scott, at least in the short run, the hiring of Mr. Ahmad has embarrassed the seemingly omniscient Rahm Emanuel.   But one suspects that the failure of the Midway deal had nothing to do with Ms. Scott’s growing problems, which should provide plenty of grist for the mill of future posts.

Indeed, Alderman O’Connor may have unwittingly told us why the deal fell apart when he, defending his master Rahm, opined

“All it’s (the collapse of the Midway deal) gonna do is tell private investors we’re getting smarter as a negotiating adversary.   They’re not gonna be able to come in and make a ton of money off us at our sufferance.”

(A point of parenthetical digression:  why has the Chicago media taken to printing the contraction “gonna” for “going to”?   Yes, we know how much the media are gaga for their boy Rahm, who uses that bastardization of the words “going to” with great frequency, but must their adoration of their consanguineous heart throb take the English language as a casualty?)  

Whether the adjective “smarter” is the most apt term here is questionable, but Mr. O’Connor is correct.   The city is negotiating more aggressively; in this case, the most salient manifestation of this determination is its insistence on a 40 or fewer year term for the Midway lease deal.  With such constraints, the potential lessees were not going to “make a ton of money off” the city.   And that is why there was ultimately only one bidder for this project.  



Genuine businesses exist to make money, one way or another, for their shareholders and partners, not to serve the whims of Super Rahm and his minions in exchange for a photo-op with the Mayor for their CEOs.   And when they don’t make money, they don’t do deals.   One suspects that people like Messrs. Emanuel and O’Connor, despite having spent their entire lives on the public payroll or selling the influence they garnered on the public payroll, know this.  Further, Mr. Emanuel will keep this simple concept in mind as he tries to light a fire under his seemingly moribund “infrastructure trust.”  Therefore, maybe we should take some comfort in the infrastructure trust’s halting progress and in the failure of the Midway deal.   If either results, or resulted, in too good a deal for taxpayers, one can be sure that side deals were being cut to make sure the contractors were making it somewhere else.

One more thing…

People are decrying the hundred of thousands of dollars spent on consultants, lawyers, etc. spent by the city and the publicly funded “Midway Advisory Panel.”  What a waste, we are told.   Baloney.   That money surely found its way into the pockets of politically connected people who make sure the politicians get their cut at election time and/or otherwise.  Thus, though the taxpayers may be stuck with the bill, the politicians are doubtless very happy with these seemingly pointless expenditures…mission indeed accomplished.


See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge, A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics. 




No comments:

Post a Comment