Fran Spielman,
the City Hall reporter for the Chicago Sun-Times, write a story published
today (“Long shot could force runoff,” page 11) arguing that while Alderman Bob Fioretti cannot possibly win a
mayoral race against Rahm Emanuel,
the presence of both Mr. Fioretti and Chicago Teachers’ Union President Karen Lewis on the primary ballot could
make a runoff more likely. (See
ALDERMAN BOB FIORETTI THROWS HIS HAT IN THE RING: OH, HEART BE STILL, 9/13/14 for more illumination on Mr. Fioretti and
his minuscule chances for winning the big office on the 5th Floor.)
A brief primer on the mayoral election process in Chicago
is in order here. Chicago
mayoral elections are no longer officially partisan; instead, there is a nonpartisan
primary in February. If a candidate gets
more than 50% of the vote, s/he becomes mayor.
If no candidate wins 50% of the vote, a runoff is held in April. Since this officially nonpartisan process was
initiated in 1999, there has been no runoff election.
Ms. Spielman, like any political junky reporter, loves a
good story. She even trotted out old
school independent strategist Don Rose
in support of her thesis, or at least in pursuit of her story. But Ms. Spielman is, in this case, clearly
delusional.
As I have said before (e.g., TONI PRECKWINKLE RULES OUT A RUNFOR MAYOR OF CHICAGO…MY READERSYAWN, 7/15/14 ), no one is
going to beat Rahm Emanuel in
February and there will be no April election.
Mr. Emanuel has the money, the organization, the cowering pols, the
obsequious “business community,” the private sector unions, and certainly the
fawning press, national and local, behind him.
Politics everywhere, but especially in Chicago ,
is about money and the people who make money, or can potentially make money,
from politics in this city on the make
are either behind Mr. Emanuel or will be wooed by promises of money, or by
threats, to get behind Mr. Emanuel.
Whether Mr. Emanuel runs against one, two, or a million opponents, that
will be the case.
Mr. Emanuel’s inevitability would be, if anything, enhanced
by the presence of both Ms. Lewis and
Mr. Fioretti on the primary ballot. Yes, there are differences between them…professional
background and race come immediately to mind.
But, fully mindful that ideology is overrated in the governance of
cities, it is useful to point out that these two are ideological clones. Their philosophies are identical…vilify and
tax the wealthy in order to pander to the poor.
In a mindless jihad that could
only be conceived by those with complete ignorance of economics, both Ms. Lewis
and Mr. Fioretti would increase the tax and regulatory burden to make the city
sort of dystopia for the productive in a gormless appeal to the baser instincts
of the masses. Hello Detroit .
If we were to join the fantasizing about the possibility of
unseating the Wise and Mighty Rahm,
we would do well to heed Greg Goldner,
Mr. Emanuel’s campaign manager in his 2002 run for Congress, as quoted in the Spielman
article, who said
“They’re (Ms.
Lewis and Mr. Fioretti) almost splitting
the progressive community. That’s not
the right starting point to go to the white ethnic base on the Northwest and
Southwest sides that might be dissatisfied with the mayor but don’t share those
leftist political views.”
If we had either Mr. Fioretti or Ms. Lewis in the race, but
not both, and a candidate who could appeal to the justifiably angry voters on
the Southwest and Northwest sides whom Mr. Emanuel regards as an endless parade
of Mikes and Mollies, then we might
have something of a race…but ultimately, at best, a race to see who gets
slaughtered in the April run-off. That
other candidate, however, has not surfaced and will not surface and, as Mr.
Goldner points out, those teed off people from my old neighborhood and their
kindred spirits from the geographical fringes of the city are not going to back
Karen Lewis or, once they’ve read more than a few paragraphs on the man, Bob Fioretti. They’d rather hold their noses and vote for
Mr. Emanuel. So Mr. Fioretti and Ms.
Lewis, if they both wind up in the race, will be battling each other for that
fraction of the black and/or progressive vote that hasn’t been bought off or
similarly mollified into voting for Mr. Emanuel…like two dogs fighting over a
picked over bone.
See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of
Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge,
A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on
how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment