Showing posts with label Dodge Dart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dodge Dart. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

CHRYSLER’S IPO: ARE WE SUPPOSED TO TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY?

9/24/13

Chrysler filed for an initial public offering (“IPO”) yesterday, but the whole exercise is something of a sham.   As loyal readers remember (See, for example, my 4/25/13 piece IMPORTED FROM DETROIT:  MARCHIONNE BETTER BE AS FAST AS ACHRYSLER 300 SRT8), Fiat and Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne is trying to buy for Fiat the 41.5% of Chrysler that it doesn’t own, which is currently is owned by a United Auto Worker (“UAW”) health care trust.  Then he plans to merge the two companies, giving Fiat access to Chrysler’s cash and fully integrating the two companies’ operations and financial statements.  Once that merger is completed, Mr. Marchionne would like to do an IPO of the new company.

The problem has been the price that Fiat would have to pay the health care trust for its 41.5% stake in Chrysler.   The trust wants $4.3 billion.  Fiat wants to pay less than half that amount.  The trust, trying to move things along, insisted on filing for the IPO, hoping to put some pressure on Chrysler and perhaps establishing a price for its stake in Chrysler.  The smart money is indicating that the IPO will be pulled when Fiat feels the heat, a price is established, or both, but, at any rate, before the IPO is actually consummated.



A few thoughts come to mind.

First, today’s (Tuesday, 9/24/13’s, page A1) Wall Street Journal reports that Mr. Marchionne is in an “awkward” position, having to go on a road show for the IPO to persuade investors to pay big bucks for Chrysler while he is trying to buy Chrysler for a lower, perhaps far lower, price.  But it is worse than that.  As I explained on 5/1/13 (CHRYSLER’S QUARTER:   HOW DO YOU SAY “POOR MOUTH” IN ITALIAN?), even if the IPO is not done, Mr. Marchionne must first argue to the health care trust that its shares are cheap and then, when the Chrysler and Fiat are merged and he prepares to IPO the new company, he must then persuade the public that the new company is worth far more, or at least more, than the price Fiat paid for Chrysler would indicate.   This is possible, but it certainly looks like Mr. Marchionne will have to go on the road and tell investors that he really hornswoggled the UAW.   This is not great labor relations and, in any event, would strain his credibility.  



Further, as I said back on 4/25, Mr. Marchionne better move quickly.   Much of the “pent up demand” we are seeing for cars is only pent up because money is so cheap.   If and when the Fed decides that bizarro world is not such a great place in which to live and interest rates return to reasonably “normal” levels, whatever that is, the car market is in for trouble.   Perhaps, however, Mr. Marchionne doesn’t have to move all that quickly; he only has to move more swiftly than the Fed.  If last week is any indication, that shouldn’t be difficult.

Second, how much genuine effort are money managers going to expend on this IPO if they believe it is all a dance designed to quicken the negotiations between Fiat and the UAW health care trust?  I’ve been out of the professional money management business for a long time, and perhaps I am so hopelessly old school (I hate using such trite expressions as “old school,” but this might be one situation when the trite expression sounds better than the alternative, “old fashioned.”  But I digress.) that my opinions matter very little.  But I wouldn’t be expending much time or expensive talent looking at an IPO that will never come.  If I were still in the business and had any authority, I wouldn’t waste my shareholders’ money doing the bidding of Mr. Marchionne and/or the UAW trust.

If the money managers’ hearts are not in this, how much real price determination will be done?

Third, how does Mr. Marchionne legitimately argue that the UAW trust’s stake in Chrysler is worth only a couple billion dollars?   Perhaps, again, I am a troglodyte, hopelessly out of touch with modern finance, but let’s look at simple multiples of earnings, a quaint old concept that maybe they don’t teach at Harvard any more.

Chrysler earned $1.6 billion in the twelve months ending 6/30/13.   Ford’s multiple of lagging earnings is about 11 times.  GM’s multiple of lagging earnings is about 13.  Let’s agree, or at least assume for these purposes, that Chrysler is neither Ford nor GM and assign it a multiple of, say, 8 times.  That would make Chrysler worth $12.8 billion.  The UAW owns 41.5% of Chrysler.  That would make its stake worth $5.3 billion. 

I must be missing something because the UAW is only claiming its stake is worth $4.3 billion and the highly paid car analysts on Wall Street value the company at $10 to $11 billion.  But even assuming those analysts are right, the UAW has it just about right when it claims its stake is worth $4.3 billion.  No coincidence that, but, again, I digress.  So how can Mr. Marchionne say the UAW stake, and by extension Chrysler, is worth only half that much?   This is, to be sure, a negotiating tactic on Mr. Marchionne’s part, but how can he keep a straight face when making this argument?

Fourth, perhaps Mr. Marchionne can make such an argument while resisting the temptation to burst into laughter because he knows what yours truly and other car enthusiasts know…Chrysler’s product line is, er, woefully lacking and Chrysler therefore will need to put a LOT of money into product development.   The Chrysler Grand Cherokee is a big hit.  The new Dodge Durango is quite a vehicle as well.   The Ram pickup line is pretty good…especially for a third place finisher in a three truck competition.  The good news ends there.  The Dodge Dart is something of a disappointment and is not up to the competition…the Honda Civic, Ford Focus, Toyota Corolla, and Mazda 3.  As much as yours truly salivates over the Chrysler 300, it and its cousin, the Dodge Charger, are getting long in the tooth and are lagging the competition.   Finally, Chrysler needs a lot of help in the mid-sized car segment…the Chrysler 200 and the Dodge Avenger (See THE DODGE AVENGER:   CHEAP AND WORTH EVERY PENNY, 6/4/13) are pathetic and sell well only because they are being virtually given away by Chrysler dealers.   No one mentions these cars in the same breath as the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, Ford Fusion, Nissan Altima, or even the Chevy Malibu.

This “IPO” will be entertaining to watch…but not as entertaining as the dance Mr. Marchionne will have to do to buy Chrysler cheap and then sell it rich...before the car market takes a dive.


Thursday, January 31, 2013

CHRYSLER’S PROBLEM: IT’S (MOST OF) THE PRODUCT, STUPID!

1/31/13

The Wall Street Journal reported this (i.e., Thursday, 1/31/13, page B6) morning that “Chrysler’s Aging Cars Pose Hurdle.”  It seems that the Fiat miracle is taking more time, money, and effort than expected; while net income is increasing smartly at Chrysler, free cash flow over the next two years is expected to fall by half to $2 billion.  The primary reason for this relentless drain of company cash is the need to refurbish a tired and relatively sorry product line.

None of this comes as a surprise to my regular readers, who recall the following posts on one of this site’s precursors, The Insightful Pontificator:





“WE ARE NOT AMUSED”, also of 5/1/09

The main point of those articles is that without good product, you don’t have a good company.   And Chrysler’s product has been wanting for years.   The Journal article has simply confirmed, and events and numbers have borne out, what my readers have known for years now.

Not all the Chrysler product is bad.   Jeep is selling briskly, and the Grand Cherokee is a hot and supposedly stellar product.  But the Grand Cherokee can’t be that good; its updated iteration was to be one of the eight new products Fiat/Chrysler’s CEO, the very capable Sergio Marchionne, wanted to introduce this year before money got too tight.  As I’ve said before, only Wall Street believes that the Jeep line is a great asset, probably because it is one of the few American brands that a Wall Street analyst would consider buying 

The Chrysler 300 is a truly great product, but that might be yours truly’s personal taste, and undying quest to find a product that would replace my long gone but still pined for 1990 Pontiac Bonneville SSE (aka “The Batmobile,” the last car with an automatic transmission that I truly loved), talking.   One of the few American sedans still available with a V8 (One of the others is the Dodge Charger, obviously another Chrysler product..), the Chrysler 300 is distinctive, powerful, safe, relatively fuel efficient, quiet luxurious, fun to drive, and a relative bargain.  And it’s a car that shows one means business.   But even the great Chrysler 300 is in a market segment characterized by (almost) equally great competition.   Still, if I ever get over what my friends and family deride as my manual transmission “fetish,” and start making some real money again, I’ll be driving one of these most testicular of automobiles.  But I digress.

The Ram pickup line also is a more than decent product, but still places third of three in its very competitive and profitable market segment.

Once one gets beyond Jeep, Ram, and the 300, one finds awfully slim pickings at Chrysler…and Mr. Marchionne knows it.   It is his urgent efforts to apply to Chrysler some of the product wizardry Fiat has displayed under his tutelage that are causing financial strain at the third of the Big 3.

One final, and somewhat personal, note:  the first of Mr. Marchionne’s efforts to produce some product fruit from Fiat’s purchase of Chrysler is the Dodge Dart, which seems to have fallen far short of expectations.   This Dart is built on the Alfa Romeo Giulietta platform and is supposed to ride and handle somewhat like an Alfa while providing a level of luxury, and an amount of room, beyond its competitors in the U.S. compact car market.   The car has, to put it only a bit too strongly, bombed, with poor sales and bloated inventories crowding dealer lots.   At first, the Dart’s problems were ascribed to the first few copies’ being available only with manual transmissions.   That problem was solved when Chrysler shipped subsequent, and much larger, batches of cars with slushboxes (i.e., automatic transmissions).  Still the car doesn’t sell.   Why?   Mr. Marchionne opined on Wednesday that there are too many variations and expensive features available of or on the Dart.

Mr. Marchionne is absolutely right.  Yours truly is interested in the Dart for the two reasons it isn’t selling:   It offers a manual transmission combined with some luxury features.  But I have all but given up my admittedly casual search for a Dart because I am confused by the baffling array of model combinations available and find that, when I have figured out what will meet my needs, I can buy a Honda Accord, which is one size larger and is, after all, a Honda, not a Dodge, for the same money.  At anything like the offered side, the otherwise excellent, or at least very good, Dart makes no sense.

However, if I could get a good enough deal on a Dart….

But it is difficult to prosper selling products nearly exclusively to people looking for, and insisting on, a great deal.