When we last visited the issue of Japan ’s attempts to reflate its economy at the behest of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (See two posts from the now defunct Rant Finance written early this year and late last year that are reproduced at the end of this screed.), yours truly expressed great concern about this seemingly necessary but inherently dangerous policy. Now that new Bank of Japan (“BOJ”) Governor, and Abe henchman, Haruhiko Kuroda, has fitted the printing presses at the BOJ with turbochargers that would make native son Speed Racer envious, the obvious results are coming to fruition; the yen hit a four year low against the dollar yesterday.
The obvious response would be something like “Well, what did Messrs. Abe and Kuroda think would happen if they publicly stated that their aim was to print yen with reckless, carefree abandon in an attempt to infuse the Japanese economy with what they consider a salubrious bout of inflation? Did they think a policy designed to weaken the yen domestically would not have repercussions in the foreign exchange (“FX”) markets?” But such a question would be naïve. Both Messrs. Abe and Kuroda knew that the yen would weaken; that was, while not the primary object of their loose money policy, certainly a secondary object. A weak yen would not only make Japanese industry “more competitive,” according to the textbooks, but also would help domestic prices to rise.
Such a policy is always dangerous, largely because it is hard to put the inflation genie back in the bottle and attempts to make one’s self “more competitive” by weakening one’s currency are doomed in anything but the short run. (If a weak currency made a country more competitive, Zimbabwe would be the world’s economic juggernaut, but that is grist for another mill.) But such a policy is, ironically, especially dangerous for Japan , whose primary economic problem for the last twenty or so years has been deflation.
As yen are created by Mr. Kuroda and his subservient, to Mr. Abe, colleagues at the BOJ, Japanese investors pull their money out of yen denominated assets in order to protect themselves against the inevitable deterioration in the yen’s value both domestically and internationally. This leads to further yen devaluation and starts a vicious downward spiral, further lessening the incentive not only for foreign investors to put money in Japan but, more importantly, for Japanese investors to keep their money at home. This would be bad enough under any circumstance, but, in Japan , with its 220% public debt/GDP ratio, and which thus needs all the investment, both domestic and foreign, it can get, such a policy could be financial suicide.
The Japanese are very smart people, and one suspects, but can’t be sure, that Mr. Kuroda nor Mr. Abe are not glaring exceptions to this rule. However, one wonders how much Messrs. Kuroda and Abe have thought through this loose money, reflationary policy. Sure, one must break the deflationary cycle and mindset in Japan . But given the vulnerability wrought by the Japanese government’s inability to put its financial house in order, does the BOJ really have the latitude to so discourage people from financing the government’s debt? Clearly, yours truly’s use of terms like “financial suicide” does not indicate that I would answer that question in the affirmative.
PROMISED REPRODUCED POSTS:
“I’M TURNING (AMERICAN) NOW !”
It seems that the same Japanese businessmen who were clamoring for a weaker yen now are concerned that new Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s enthusiastic accession to their desires may be going too far. The major fear of these captains of Japanese industry is the impact a too weak yen might have on imported energy prices, especially in the wake of Japan ’s at least temporary denuclearization.
While the fears of these hard to please business titans regarding energy prices are justified, the larger fear ought to be the impact of a weak yen on the price and availability of imported capital. As I explained in my 12/19/12 post, SHINZO ABE TO THE BANK OF JAPAN: BE MORE AMERICAN!, and in earlier posts to which it refers, Japan has the largest government debt to GDP ratio in the developed world… 220%. Until recently, this wasn’t much of a problem because, with the prodigious savings rate of the Japanese people, this debt could easily be financed internally. But with demographics, and, to a lesser extent, attitudes resulting in a more Americanesque savings rate of about 2%, Japan increasingly has to import capital to finance, among other things, its government’s budget deficits. A weakening currency, and a decided and declared government policy to further weaken a currency, does not get international lenders excited about committing capital to a country. Thus, unless Japan ’s political and business leaders put away the Econ 101 textbooks with all their drivel about “terms of trade” and abandon that great nation’s newfound weak yen policy, Japan could face severe financial problems in the very near future.
Yes, a nation finds itself in a precarious position when it must import much of the energy it consumes. But if you think importing most of a country’s energy leads to problems, consider the more debilitating impact of importing most of a country’s capital. And Japan will soon be in a position of importing both energy and capital in brogdingnagian quantities.
Yikes!
SHINZO ABE TO THE BANK OF JAPAN : BE MORE AMERICAN!
The effective election of third generation Japanese pol Shinzo Abe as Prime Minister last weekend spells trouble for the Japanese central bank.
To the extent people over here have followed the Japanese election, they have focused on Mr. Abe’s nationalistic foreign policy views. His most immediate, and at least for now, largest impact, should be on the Bank of Japan (“BOJ”). Mr. Abe is pushing for abandoning the JGB’s current 1% inflation “goal” in favor of a firm 2% inflation “target.” He also wants the BOJ to go into the business of creating money to finance government spending. Perhaps most important, he wants to legislatively chip away at the Bank’s independence so that a even a more reasonable future prime minister will feel less compunction about using the BOJ as an arm of the government.
Having the BOJ join its brethren central banks in the developed world in emasculating its currency would be especially dangerous for Japan . Japanese government debt stands at 220% of GDP , the highest in the developed world, even if we look the other way and expand the definition of “developed” to include Greece . As I explained in my 9/21/12 post, JGBs AND THE JAPANESE SAVINGS RATE , this condition has prevailed for years but has not been a problem due to Japan’s historical gargantuan savings rate…as high as 44% as recently as 1990. With people saving at these prodigious rates, even Japan ’s brobdingnagian deficits could be financed domestically. But now, due to demographics and the importation of more American attitudes toward saving and postponement of gratification, the Japanese savings rate has fallen to levels with which Americans are familiar…around 2%. Thus, Japan ’s customary huge deficits must increasingly be financed overseas; indeed, foreigners now hold about 9% of Japanese government debt, a record.
With Japan having to sell a rapidly growing share of its debt overseas, it is imperative that the yen remain strong. But with Mr. Abe’s pressuring BOJ President Masaaki Shirakawa to pursue a 2% inflation rate and print money so Mr. Abe can spend more and threatening the central bank’s independence, we are beginning to see a very non-Japanese posture toward the value of the yen. This should have a decidedly negative impact on the ardor of foreign investors for holding Japanese government bonds (“JGB”s). Predictably, JGBs have taken a beating in the few weeks since it has become apparent that Mr. Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party (“LDP ”) would win the election and are now trading at an eight month high yield of 1.74% on the twenty year.
One could argue that the Fed’s pursuing an expansionary monetary policy very similar to the policy proposed by Mr. Abe has done nothing to hurt foreigners’ enthusiasm for treasuries, and we have to finance a much larger share of our government debt overseas. But one would be wrong. More than ¾ of Treasury issuance is now being purchased by the Fed; no one, Chinese, Japanese, or American, is lining up to buy U.S. treasuries at the prevailing 1.79% yield on the ten year, especially when the reason that paltry yield prevails is the Fed’s creating money to finance the government’s spending. We will be in for a rude awakening when (if?) the Fed decides to throttle back and we expect our Chinese and Japanese friends to pick up the slack. If the Japanese adopt American attitudes toward central banking, as they have toward saving, they will face the same problem, but with twice as much government debt, relative to GDP , as we have.
No comments:
Post a Comment